I DO NOT CONSENT
Evidence Supplemental to Constitutional Correspondence.
Issued on 18 November 2025
Publication Date: 1 December 2025
This constitutional correspondence can be viewed and
downloaded at:
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/redacted_constitutional_correspondence_sent_18112025.pdf
The evidence and documentation which now follows below,
demonstrates, beyond any reasonable doubt, that police
showed no independent professional curiosity in determining
whether serious criminal offences had been committed.
Instead, the only consistent tactic was to shut every report
down and prevent crime numbers from being issued. The rule
of law, the victim-led approach, basic safeguarding principles
and established best practice were all deliberately set aside.This resulted in serious crimes, identifiable suspects and extensive evidence being systematically hidden, dismissed
and ignored under a blanket UK-wide instruction.
The abruptly closed Metropolitan Police case, Crime
Reference Number 6029679/21, became the template across
all four nations, used to justify the blanket rejection of every
similar crime allegation submitted within respective policing jurisdictions.
Despite thousands of people submitting detailed evidence of
serious criminal conduct in England, Scotland, Wales and
Northern Ireland, a nationwide ban was imposed, preventing
these matters from being investigated at all. There are
compelling indications that this ban remains in effect, even today.
The positions taken by the National Police Chiefs’ Council
(NPCC), Gold Command and senior officers such as Police
Scotland’s Deputy Chief Constable Alan Speirs, together with
contradictory statements given to the Covid Inquiry, the
damning findings of HMICFRS and indeed the warnings raised
in the House of Lords, paint a bleak picture of policing in
disarray. The approach was improvised, inconsistent and
devoid of lawful foundation.The contradictions, denials and suppression of crime reports
across the UK demonstrate the existence of a two-tier system,
one which actively disadvantaged and marginalised thousands
of innocent victims from seeking lawful protection.
Why did this happen?
Because any full and transparent criminal investigation would
inevitably expose criminal wrongdoing carried out by
individuals within public office, including, potentially, senior policing figures themselves.
This is not independent policing. It is policing functioning as an
extension of the executive government establishment -
operating to shield itself, to withhold truth from the public and
to prevent accountability for those responsible, to a degree
which has misled not only the people of Britain, but has also misled the judiciary.
The system now appears designed not to protect the public
from harm, but to protect the system from the public.
A video, presentation by Mark Sexton accompanies this
evidence release - the video can be viewed using this link:https://youtu.be/rEBkLzH2e_E?si=19zXNSqWi3HXHWnG
The Leak in the Wall:
Part 1 - Police Scotland’s FOI Disclosure
Core assertions:
20 March 2025 disclosure of a specific directive changed
everything and proved NPCC / Gold involvement.
Exhibit 1
FOI 25-0673 Letter
The FOI response itself, dated 20 March 2025 is the “leak
in the wall” piece: it confirms that a particular directive
existed, its terms and also, the involvement of NPCC /
Gold provenance.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/police_scotland_foi_response_20032025.pdf
The Leak in the Wall:Part 2 - The Hidden Directive: Speirs and
Scotland
Core assertions:
Police Scotland issued a secret directive on 25 Jan 2022
ordering rejection of all vaccine-related crime reports,
said to be on National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) / UK
Gold Command advice.
Exhibit 2
FOI 25-0673: Speirs Directive (Police Scotland FOI
Disclosure - 20 March 2025)
The original directive email, explicitly instructing officers
to reject vaccine-related crime reports and log them only
as SID/CVI, and stating it was issued “on the advice of the
NPCC and UK Gold Command.”
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/FOI_25_0673_police_scotland_speirs_directive.pdf
Exhibit 3
Speirs Email of 18 November 2025 and Ian Clayton’s
response of 19 November 2025Alan Speirs’ retrospective explanation reproducing the
same narrative and acknowledging the statement was
published on the Police Scotland intranet, confirming
provenance and scope.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/emails_from_20092025_to_19112025.pdf
The Papers Don’t Match:
NPCC’s Own Disclosures
Core assertions:
NPCC’s internal FOI documents operationally corroborate
the Speirs directive (non-recording guidance, central co
ordination, etc.).
Exhibit 4
NPCC Internal Emails on “Guidance Not to Record”
The email chain, where national guidance about handling
vaccine reports is discussed and where non-recording /
diversion is described as “successful”.https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/a4_FW_Full_Fact_Time_sensitive_false_claims_of_live_i_250715_164048.pdf
Exhibit 5
NPCC / National Police Coordination Centre (NPoCC)
(Strategic Intelligence & Briefing (SIB) Operational Briefing
Note
A briefing slide pack showing:
• Talla-linked coordination,
• national monitoring of vaccine-related approaches,
and
• central handling of FOI/media responses.
This evidence makes NPCC denials untenable.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/a3_Q1_Anti_Vaccination_Briefing_note_REDACTED_Final_250715_163904.pdf
The UK-Wide Pattern:
Quietly Closing the Gates
Core assertions:Same rejection pattern appears across all four UK nations;
frontline officers say they are “not allowed” to take
evidence.
Exhibit 6
Police Scotland Street-Level Video
Video where officers tell a member of the public they are
not allowed to take that evidence in relation to the
vaccines.
This took place at a police station. It involved a group of
people and this was new evidence being referred to, which
had been gathered from Covid Inquiry submissions, some
2 years after the Januarry 2022 directive (long after
Operation Talla had officially ended. It presents yet more
shocking evidence of an unlawful blanket ban on all crime
recording or investigations - a policy which is
astonishingly, still in force.
https://youtube.com/shorts/1e90oAtJoz0?si=8xX1aI2UOeLQuI1c
Exhibit 7
NPCC FOI Disclosures
Passages showing:
• central briefings on vaccine-related approaches;• satisfaction that “guidance not to record” or similar
had been followed by forces.
• These together show both policy-level and frontline
suppression.
From pages 14, 19, 20 on this Exhibit 7, it can be
established that the MPS have acknowledged the
worldwide interest surrounding this particular crime
report.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/NPCC_FOI_disclosures.pdf
Exhibit 8
NPCC letter dated 24 July 2025
Comment by Ethical Approach UK re the NPCC letter of 24
July 2025:
“No UK policing agreement, whether NPCC-led, Section
22a based, or arranged separately with Police Scotland
and/or Police Service Northern Ireland (PSNI), can override
the legal duties of any UK police force.The Cover Story:
“No National Instruction” and “Vexatious”
FOIs
Core assertions:
NPCC denied any national instruction, denied Talla as a
command structure and labelled Ethical Approach lawful
FOIs “vexatious.”
Exhibit 9
NPCC FOI Response Labelling Ethical Approach FOIs as
“Vexatious”
The letter/email where NPCC explicitly uses the
“vexatious” tag in response to Ethical Approach UK
Operation Talla and vaccine-reporting questions.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/2558_2025_NPCC_Response_Letter_Operation_Talla_251125_225452.pdf
Exhibit10
NPCC FOI Responses Denying National Instruction.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/npcc_letter_14052025_page2.jpg
These now sit in direct contradiction with the Speirs
Directive and NPCC’s own internal material.
NOTE ALSO:
Police Scotland’s 25 January 2022 Speirs Directive
explicitly states it was issued “on the advice of the NPCC
and UK Gold Command”, which directly contradicts the
NPCC’s later evidence to the Covid Inquiry denying that
any national instruction or guidance to reject vaccine
related complaints ever existed.
Exhibit 10a in link below provides relevant evidence of
contradiction:
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/NQ000587776_251109_095908.pdf
Both key documents - the Rule 9 Statement to the Covid
Inquiry (INQ000587776) AND the Speirs Directive (25
January 2022) were authored by the same individual:
Deputy Chief Constable (formerly Assistant Chief
Constable) Alan Speirs.
The Promise and the PoliceCore assertions:
Operation Talla as a UK-wide framework; early drift into
enforcing guidance as law.
Exhibit 11
Essex Police “Specific Privacy Notice - COVID-19
(Operation Talla)” (30 March 2020)
Shows Operation Talla named as the operational
framework, with “enhanced” COVID-specific data
gathering.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/essex_police_talla_screenshot.jpg
Exhibit 12
Social media post by PC Unsworth (Northamptonshire
Police - April 2021) referencing Operation Talla Policing.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/pc_unsworth_talla_X_post_April_2021.jpg
Exhibit 13
H.M. Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire &Rescue
Services (HMICFRS) Early Pandemic Report (April 2020)Passages where HMICFRS records police acting as
“coercive agents of ministers” and enforcing ministerial
guidance as if it were law.
(Please refer to page 14)
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/hmicfrs_report_april_2021.pdf
Exhibit 14
House of Lords Constitutional Report (June 2021)
Highlights misrepresentation of the law and the blurring of
guidance v legal restrictions, leading to police enforcing
non-laws.
Please refer to:
CHAPTER 4: LEGAL CLARITY AND ACCESSIBILITY
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/HoL_Constitutional_Report_document(6)_251126_094913.pdf
The First Serious Challenge:
Crime Reference Number (CRN) 6029679/21
Core assertions:CRN created; portal opened; witnesses told investigation
was underway.
Exhibit 15
Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) CRN Letter from
Detective Superintendent (DS) Tor Garnett (21 February
2022)
Confirms reference 6029679/21, describes the allegations
and states MPS has considered them.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/tor_garnett_correspondence_21022022.jpg
Exhibit 16
MPS Box.com Evidence Portal (screenshots)
Shows a live secure upload portal branded “MPS” for CRN
6029679/21, evidencing that an organised evidence
gathering mechanism was in place.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/invitation_to_MPS_evidence_dropbox.jpg
Exhibit 17
This Evidence Portal for CRN 6029679/21 still remains
operational as of 25 November 2025.https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/MPS_dropbox_screenshot_25112025.png
Exhibit 18
Mark Sexton email to Independent Office for Police
Conduct (IOPC), confirming hundreds of Written
statements were handed into Hammersmith in person.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/Mark_Sexton_email_to_IOPC_25_May.pdf
Exhibit 19
Part of the actual evidence itself, which was physically
submitted in person to the MPS and receipts/emails
relating to the submissions, signed by / involving
interaction with MPS personnel
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/MPS_submission_evidence.png
Exhibit 20
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request by Ian Clayton
on behalf of Ethical Approach UK (12 September 2025) to
MPS - Operation Talla / CRN 6029679/21 and Related
Guidance - No response received from MPS https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/FormSubmission_foi_request_formfoi_24460_25_0100_0_250912_173626.pdf
Exhibit 21
Email correspondence - Ian Clayton / MPS (July to
September 2025).
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/emails_16072025_to_05092025_MPS_Clayton_REDACTED.pdf
Exhibit 22
This letter from Andrew Bridgen MP to Sir Mark Rowley,
Commissioner of the MPS, formally raises concerns about
potential criminality connected to the Government’s
Covid-19 response and requests urgent engagement from
senior MPS leadership.
Sir Mark Rowley did not reply.
His non-response contributes to the evidential pattern of
high-level avoidance, when criminal concerns about the
vaccine programme have been submitted, even by elected
officials.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/a_bridgen_letter_20022024.pdf
The Shift:
“No Offences, No Investigation”
Core assertions:
Public “no offences / no grounds” line contradicts the
operational reality of evidence gathering.
Exhibit 23
Tor Garnett CRN Closure Letter (21 February 2022)
States the vaccines are safe, alleges “no basis in the
available evidence” and concludes there is no criminal
offence and “no further action will be taken.”
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/tor_garnett_correspondence_21022022.jpg
Exhibit 24
Evidence of Portal and Witness Assurances
Combination of:
Box.com portal evidence (Exhibits 16 and 17 above) and
MPS call audio from a member of the public.Audio link:
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/MetropolitanPolice_investi
gation_Confirmation_audio.m4a
Together they demonstrate the fracture: an active
evidence-collection infrastructure plus assurances,
followed by a bald public “no investigation / no offences”
closure.
The Judicial Angle:
Poole J and the JR
Core assertions:
Judge Poole ruled no investigation, out of time, and
without merit, without being told material facts (portal,
400 statements, Speirs-type policy, etc.).
Exhibit 25
Judge Poole Judicial Review Ruling (AC-2023-LON-001880)
The order and reasons where he states:
• no investigation occurred,
• the claim is out of time, and• it is without merit.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/JR_ruling_AC-2023-LON-001880%20(1)_250803_133225.pdf
Exhibit 26 (notional)
Evidence Showing Undisclosed Material Facts
A two-item bundle:
(1) Tor Garnett letter and Box portal (Exhibits 16 and 23
above), and
(2) Mark Sexton evidence about 400 witness / expert /
whistleblower statements submitted and officers
confirming an investigation was underway (Exhibit 24
above).
Those pieces together show that what Poole was told (no
investigation, nothing to disclose) was incompatible with
the actual investigative footprint.
Exhibit 27
Is Poole J’s finding actually sustainable?
A forensic legal analysis.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/poole_CRN_and_JR_considerations.pdf
What Police Have Really Defended
Core assertions:
Police defended the Executive’s political vaccine interests
by keeping allegations out of the criminal system
altogether.
Exhibit 28 (notional)
Speirs Directive and NPCC Internal Guidance (Exhibits 2
and 4 above)
Side-by-side, these show:
a blanket non-recording order and UK-wide coordination
of the same approach.
This illustrates that the system was designed to block
entry into the criminal process.
Exhibit 29
Covid Inquiry Email to Mark Sexton (July 2022)
The Inquiry’s email explicitly stating that:
it cannot determine criminal liability, andserious criminality evidence must be referred to the
police, who are the correct authority to investigate crime.
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/email_from_UKCovidInquir
y_25072022.jpg
Additional References (for info)
Exhibit 30
Sir Graham Brady and the Birdcage Walk Meeting
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/graham_brady_and_the_meeting_at_birdcage_walk.pdf
Exhibit 31
The emails
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/brady_emails_sept_oct_2021.pdf
Exhibit 32
Sir Graham Brady Interview in July 2023 in which he
states, “the British public were taken for a ride” and
“Eminent scientists were silenced”https://youtube.com/shorts/mCRng7-x-_M?si=VlYlensTfVO6B7TY
Exhibit 33
“Independent” News Article (2021)
Senior Tory MP Sir Graham Brady ‘met with anti-vaxxers’
MP reportedly says listening to views ‘does not amount to
endorsement’
Author: Zoe Tidman
Published: Thursday 30 September 2021
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/covidantivaxxers-graham-brady-meeting-b1930027.html
Exhibit 34
The UK minister responsible for the COVIS-19 vaccine
programme, Nadim Zahawi MP, Warwickshire Police and
Superintendent Peter Hill
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/nadhim_zahawi_and_warwickshire_police.pdf
Exhibit 35
The emails
https://ethicalapproach.co.uk/emails_zahawi_june_2021.pdf
Exhibit 36
The video of correspondence delivery
My Blog
British Lions for Freedom